User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20121207092215/@comment-4028641-20121209031105: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Sichamousacoricothingmabob wrote: | Sichamousacoricothingmabob wrote: | ||
Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
Agreed. The point just doesn't stand much ground; so what if it wasn't used in a narrative? What's the problem with that? Basically you should just drop that argument now... | Agreed. The point just doesn't stand much ground; so what if it wasn't used in a narrative? What's the problem with that? Basically you should just drop that argument now... | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121207092215-188432/20121209031105-4028641]]</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 27 April 2023
Sichamousacoricothingmabob wrote: STRONG STRONG OPPOSE
As it has been said many a times above, who cares what it was on the show, this isn't that, this is a Wikia about Doctor Who, we can call it what we like. I like the name. It doesn't matter if somepeople call it the 'TARDIS wikia', because that's just a colloquial name, even I use it to call it shorthand, but officially, it should stay 'TARDIS index file Wikia'.
Agreed. The point just doesn't stand much ground; so what if it wasn't used in a narrative? What's the problem with that? Basically you should just drop that argument now...