User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-188432-20130402083138: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-188432-20130402083138'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
Line 9: Line 8:


We need someone, in a narrative, to tell us that these Claras are not the same character, that there is something akin to "reincarnation" going on, before we should present split articles.
We need someone, in a narrative, to tell us that these Claras are not the same character, that there is something akin to "reincarnation" going on, before we should present split articles.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402083138-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:44, 27 April 2023

ComicBookGoddess wrote: My mind is made up on three; it's just I feel that we should be certain WHY we end up with three. ;)

Precisely. We need to be certain. That's why we should have one until there's definitive proof that there's more than one.

Because we don't really know what to call the "other" Claras without using massive disambiguation terms, we should go as simple as possible and put it all on one page.

We need someone, in a narrative, to tell us that these Claras are not the same character, that there is something akin to "reincarnation" going on, before we should present split articles.