User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401041553: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130401041553'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
ComicBookGoddess wrote:
Line 5: Line 4:
</div>
</div>
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but picking and choosing at random is not "the simple default theory." The default is, in fact, one page, since we are told that she's the same woman, and we have no proof to the contrary.
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but picking and choosing at random is not "the simple default theory." The default is, in fact, one page, since we are told that she's the same woman, and we have no proof to the contrary.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130401041553-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:45, 27 April 2023

ComicBookGoddess wrote: Is there anybody arguing for an end point other than three articles? Czech thinks one, anybody else? Given my simple default theory, anybody else still thinking split the modern Claras?

I'm sorry to disappoint you, but picking and choosing at random is not "the simple default theory." The default is, in fact, one page, since we are told that she's the same woman, and we have no proof to the contrary.