User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130402103755: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130402103755'''
No, it would be [[Clara Oswin Oswald]], which covers all three. [[Clara Oswald]] falls under it, as does [[Oswin Oswald]], and, of course, Victorian [[Clara Oswin Oswald]]. From a naming perspective, the simplest.
No, it would be [[Clara Oswin Oswald]], which covers all three. [[Clara Oswald]] falls under it, as does [[Oswin Oswald]], and, of course, Victorian [[Clara Oswin Oswald]]. From a naming perspective, the simplest.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402103755-26975268]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 21:46, 27 April 2023

No, it would be Clara Oswin Oswald, which covers all three. Clara Oswald falls under it, as does Oswin Oswald, and, of course, Victorian Clara Oswin Oswald. From a naming perspective, the simplest.