User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-26975268-20130402105213: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yes, and Oswin's specifically not Clara. I am aware. | Yes, and Oswin's specifically not Clara. I am aware. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
In fact, it ''is'' that — on the opposite ends of the spectrum, we have Oswin Oswald and Clara Oswald. Then, in the middle, mixing the two, we have Clara Oswin Oswald. That name — the name on the gravestone — relates to all of them. | In fact, it ''is'' that — on the opposite ends of the spectrum, we have Oswin Oswald and Clara Oswald. Then, in the middle, mixing the two, we have Clara Oswin Oswald. That name — the name on the gravestone — relates to all of them. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130402105213-26975268]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:46, 27 April 2023
Yes, and Oswin's specifically not Clara. I am aware.
As stated, the different Claras would get subsections, in which they'd be referred to by their individual names.
What you don't seem to be understanding is that Clara Oswin Oswald encompasses them all. If she had a collective name for all her incarnations, it'd be that.
In fact, it is that — on the opposite ends of the spectrum, we have Oswin Oswald and Clara Oswald. Then, in the middle, mixing the two, we have Clara Oswin Oswald. That name — the name on the gravestone — relates to all of them.
