User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-2378-20131206145913/@comment-188432-20131206194849: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-2378-20131206145913/@comment-188432-20131206194849'''
Minor issues like this are best placed either at [[Board:The Reference Desk]], or – even better — the article talk page.   
Minor issues like this are best placed either at [[Board:The Reference Desk]], or – even better — the article talk page.   


Line 5: Line 4:


So I'll go ahead and finish TD's job there.  But, just to be clear, this isn't the sort of issue that needed much discussion or admin intervention. It's a pretty cut and dried case of speculation by a single user and a slightly incomplete cleanup on aisle 2944.
So I'll go ahead and finish TD's job there.  But, just to be clear, this isn't the sort of issue that needed much discussion or admin intervention. It's a pretty cut and dried case of speculation by a single user and a slightly incomplete cleanup on aisle 2944.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20131206145913-2378/20131206194849-188432]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 22:23, 27 April 2023

Minor issues like this are best placed either at Board:The Reference Desk, or – even better — the article talk page.

If you go to the Talk:Robophobia (audio story) page, you'll find helpful notes about this issue. Tangerineduel removed the "math" that gets you to that 30th century date, but probably didn't think to look in the infobox. Until an edit by user:Claude North, who also added the bit TD removed, the box said 23rd century.

So I'll go ahead and finish TD's job there. But, just to be clear, this isn't the sort of issue that needed much discussion or admin intervention. It's a pretty cut and dried case of speculation by a single user and a slightly incomplete cleanup on aisle 2944.