User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20151101001641/@comment-1432718-20151101002327: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. Actually, its the infoboxes that are redundant. Material should never be put in an infobox without also including it in the article. Infoboxes are not substitutes for articles. | 1. Actually, its the infoboxes that are redundant. Material should never be put in an infobox without also including it in the article. Infoboxes are not substitutes for articles. | ||
2+ I've written a lot of leads for stories that I haven't heard/seen/read, that's why so many just have name, author and occasionally featured characters. I suggest you browse stories that have well-developed leads to see what we include so you can get an idea what is lead-worthy. Anything that might not be worthy of the lead but still useful can be put in the story notes section. | 2+ I've written a lot of leads for stories that I haven't heard/seen/read, that's why so many just have name, author and occasionally featured characters. I suggest you browse stories that have well-developed leads to see what we include so you can get an idea what is lead-worthy. Anything that might not be worthy of the lead but still useful can be put in the story notes section. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151101001641-24894325/20151101002327-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:27, 27 April 2023
1. Actually, its the infoboxes that are redundant. Material should never be put in an infobox without also including it in the article. Infoboxes are not substitutes for articles.
2+ I've written a lot of leads for stories that I haven't heard/seen/read, that's why so many just have name, author and occasionally featured characters. I suggest you browse stories that have well-developed leads to see what we include so you can get an idea what is lead-worthy. Anything that might not be worthy of the lead but still useful can be put in the story notes section.
