User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20151024182247/@comment-5918438-20151025185227: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm glad you two were able to move past the conflict. On the topic of the thread: I agree with Mewiet and Skittles, in that the only info on specific Doctors' pages should be information related to ''that'' incarnation of the Doctor. If it doesn't involve that incarnation, it doesn't belong on that particular article. On an article on regeneration, or the Doctor's regeneration? Sure! It might be cool to look at all the regenerations and near-regenerations in one place. But the only info about the previous Doctor that belongs on a given Doctor page is the leadup to the regeneration into ''them''. | I'm glad you two were able to move past the conflict. On the topic of the thread: I agree with Mewiet and Skittles, in that the only info on specific Doctors' pages should be information related to ''that'' incarnation of the Doctor. If it doesn't involve that incarnation, it doesn't belong on that particular article. On an article on regeneration, or the Doctor's regeneration? Sure! It might be cool to look at all the regenerations and near-regenerations in one place. But the only info about the previous Doctor that belongs on a given Doctor page is the leadup to the regeneration into ''them''. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151024182247-25041817/20151025185227-5918438]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:35, 27 April 2023
I'm glad you two were able to move past the conflict. On the topic of the thread: I agree with Mewiet and Skittles, in that the only info on specific Doctors' pages should be information related to that incarnation of the Doctor. If it doesn't involve that incarnation, it doesn't belong on that particular article. On an article on regeneration, or the Doctor's regeneration? Sure! It might be cool to look at all the regenerations and near-regenerations in one place. But the only info about the previous Doctor that belongs on a given Doctor page is the leadup to the regeneration into them.
