User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20180114204444/@comment-25041817-20180723222217: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we're getting a tad off topic hear. I just wanted to talk about the effectiveness of a name template for Dreyfus. | I think we're getting a tad off topic hear. I just wanted to talk about the effectiveness of a name template for Dreyfus. | ||
But, if this is how the conversation has evolved to, this might be interesting: I personally don't use "incarnations" for the Master, unless when talking about one that is shown to be between regenerations. I prefer to use the term "rendition", since the whole "is body theft a regeneration" thing makes it hard to know what counts and what doesn't. So, put could call Pratt and Ainley renditions of the Master rather than incarnations of the Master to simplify matters. | But, if this is how the conversation has evolved to, this might be interesting: I personally don't use "incarnations" for the Master, unless when talking about one that is shown to be between regenerations. I prefer to use the term "rendition", since the whole "is body theft a regeneration" thing makes it hard to know what counts and what doesn't. So, put could call Pratt and Ainley renditions of the Master rather than incarnations of the Master to simplify matters. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20180114204444-25041817/20180723222217-25041817]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:36, 27 April 2023
I think we're getting a tad off topic hear. I just wanted to talk about the effectiveness of a name template for Dreyfus.
But, if this is how the conversation has evolved to, this might be interesting: I personally don't use "incarnations" for the Master, unless when talking about one that is shown to be between regenerations. I prefer to use the term "rendition", since the whole "is body theft a regeneration" thing makes it hard to know what counts and what doesn't. So, put could call Pratt and Ainley renditions of the Master rather than incarnations of the Master to simplify matters.
