User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-26845762-20170321144605: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
First off, we are a Dr Who wiki. If we start using images from Blake's 7 to illustrate some articles, what's to stop us from borrowing pictures from Wikipedia to illustrate [[The Algonquin]]? I say we keep our images only to those directly and intentionally related to Doctor Who or any of the other series we cover. | First off, we are a Dr Who wiki. If we start using images from Blake's 7 to illustrate some articles, what's to stop us from borrowing pictures from Wikipedia to illustrate [[The Algonquin]]? I say we keep our images only to those directly and intentionally related to Doctor Who or any of the other series we cover. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Keep in mind that the bottom rung of my proposed "triangle" is for ''stories that were considered nonvalid only because of their possibility for variation''. Shady was disqualified because it was "one big deleted scene", not because it could differ between viewers. I was thinking more ''[[Attack of the Graske (video game)|Attack of the Graske]]'', ''[[Choose the Future]]'', stageplays, & ''[[Legacy (video game)|Legacy]]''. | Keep in mind that the bottom rung of my proposed "triangle" is for ''stories that were considered nonvalid only because of their possibility for variation''. Shady was disqualified because it was "one big deleted scene", not because it could differ between viewers. I was thinking more ''[[Attack of the Graske (video game)|Attack of the Graske]]'', ''[[Choose the Future]]'', stageplays, & ''[[Legacy (video game)|Legacy]]''. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20170222025243-26845762/20170321144605-26845762]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 27 April 2023
First off, we are a Dr Who wiki. If we start using images from Blake's 7 to illustrate some articles, what's to stop us from borrowing pictures from Wikipedia to illustrate The Algonquin? I say we keep our images only to those directly and intentionally related to Doctor Who or any of the other series we cover.
Keep in mind at we haven't gotten an admin to chime in too recently, but in my opinion those other things you've proposed would fall under "DWM illustrations". Admittedly, I was initially apprehensive, but if these are images which illustrate ideas that have been introduced within a valid source, why not use them?
Keep in mind that the bottom rung of my proposed "triangle" is for stories that were considered nonvalid only because of their possibility for variation. Shady was disqualified because it was "one big deleted scene", not because it could differ between viewers. I was thinking more Attack of the Graske, Choose the Future, stageplays, & Legacy.
