User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-39450671-20200330222925/@comment-6032121-20200606134502: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-39450671-20200330222925/@comment-6032121-20200606134502'''
Oh, the same way we always handle these sorts of conflicts. There would be separate pages for the Tzun Master <small>("[[The Master (First Frontier)]]")</small> and the Old Master <small>("[[Old Master]]"/"[[Old Master (Doctor Who]]")</small>, per the end credits of the TV Movie, to separate from Roberts who'd get "[[The Master (Doctor Who)]]"), and without being ''explicit'' about this, we'd put, at the end of the biography of the ''First Frontier'' Master, something like:
Oh, the same way we always handle these sorts of conflicts. There would be separate pages for the Tzun Master <small>("[[The Master (First Frontier)]]")</small> and the Old Master <small>("[[Old Master]]"/"[[Old Master (Doctor Who]]")</small>, per the end credits of the TV Movie, to separate from Roberts who'd get "[[The Master (Doctor Who)]]"), and without being ''explicit'' about this, we'd put, at the end of the biography of the ''First Frontier'' Master, something like:


Line 7: Line 6:


If we can have [[:Template:WhichDoctor]], we can have a sentence explaining that maybe it was the Ainley Master who got executed instead of the Tipple Master and/or Rathbone Master, y'know? This doesn't feel like an insurmountable problem, let alone one that requires speculation to solve.
If we can have [[:Template:WhichDoctor]], we can have a sentence explaining that maybe it was the Ainley Master who got executed instead of the Tipple Master and/or Rathbone Master, y'know? This doesn't feel like an insurmountable problem, let alone one that requires speculation to solve.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200330222925-39450671/20200606134502-6032121]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:12, 27 April 2023

Oh, the same way we always handle these sorts of conflicts. There would be separate pages for the Tzun Master ("The Master (First Frontier)") and the Old Master ("Old Master"/"Old Master (Doctor Who"), per the end credits of the TV Movie, to separate from Roberts who'd get "The Master (Doctor Who)"), and without being explicit about this, we'd put, at the end of the biography of the First Frontier Master, something like:

When receiving a psychic call from a Master who was placed on trial by the Daleks, the Seventh Doctor reminisced that this "saturnine-looking" bearded man had recently extended his life using alien biomass, (PROSE: The Novel of the Film) much as this Master had done. (PROSE: First Frontier)

And leave it at that.

If we can have Template:WhichDoctor, we can have a sentence explaining that maybe it was the Ainley Master who got executed instead of the Tipple Master and/or Rathbone Master, y'know? This doesn't feel like an insurmountable problem, let alone one that requires speculation to solve.