User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-2162194-20190210120902: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-2162194-20190210120902'''
I don't see why we need to seperate the pages, as to me in causes more confusion. To me it would make sense to have it on one page with either Landau's Romana 3 as an alternative timeline part of the page or as it is. Landau's Romana does happen as part of the established timeline, though both times Ward's Romana regenerates into her gets aborted.
I don't see why we need to seperate the pages, as to me in causes more confusion. To me it would make sense to have it on one page with either Landau's Romana 3 as an alternative timeline part of the page or as it is. Landau's Romana does happen as part of the established timeline, though both times Ward's Romana regenerates into her gets aborted.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150311013943-43908/20190210120902-2162194]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 23:33, 27 April 2023

I don't see why we need to seperate the pages, as to me in causes more confusion. To me it would make sense to have it on one page with either Landau's Romana 3 as an alternative timeline part of the page or as it is. Landau's Romana does happen as part of the established timeline, though both times Ward's Romana regenerates into her gets aborted.