User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45692830-20200511054726/@comment-39988495-20200511160136: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote"> | <div class="quote"> | ||
Borisashton wrote: | Borisashton wrote: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Wait, that article in Short Trips: Past Tense was intended to be in-universe? I thought it was a "what if?" scenario, as opposed to an in-universe publication. | Wait, that article in Short Trips: Past Tense was intended to be in-universe? I thought it was a "what if?" scenario, as opposed to an in-universe publication. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200511054726-45692830/20200511160136-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 27 April 2023
Borisashton wrote: I don't see any reason why we can't create the pages. In fact, the mention of DWM isn't a problem because we already have Doctor Who Magazine (The Thief of Sherwood) as a place to put this new info. Again, this is nothing new. Why diverge from our most basic policy for page creation of covering all nouns now?
Wait, that article in Short Trips: Past Tense was intended to be in-universe? I thought it was a "what if?" scenario, as opposed to an in-universe publication.
