User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20200517150418/@comment-6032121-20200618221932: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@[[User:TazminDaytime]]: You are missing a level of recursion with ''[[Doctor Who and the Time War (short story)|Doctor Who and the Time War]]''. It is, as you say, irrelevant that it was originally written in 2013 and held back. But the actual story, as written in 2013, was, unrelatedly, written to look like an extract from a nonexistent novel — indeed, for a nonexistent ''Target novelisation'', looking at the style and the design of the cover. ''That'' is the respect in which it can be likened to ''[[How The Monk Got His Habit (short story)|How The Monk Got His Habit]]''. | @[[User:TazminDaytime]]: You are missing a level of recursion with ''[[Doctor Who and the Time War (short story)|Doctor Who and the Time War]]''. It is, as you say, irrelevant that it was originally written in 2013 and held back. But the actual story, as written in 2013, was, unrelatedly, written to look like an extract from a nonexistent novel — indeed, for a nonexistent ''Target novelisation'', looking at the style and the design of the cover. ''That'' is the respect in which it can be likened to ''[[How The Monk Got His Habit (short story)|How The Monk Got His Habit]]''. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200517150418-6032121/20200618221932-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:06, 28 April 2023
@User:TazminDaytime: You are missing a level of recursion with Doctor Who and the Time War. It is, as you say, irrelevant that it was originally written in 2013 and held back. But the actual story, as written in 2013, was, unrelatedly, written to look like an extract from a nonexistent novel — indeed, for a nonexistent Target novelisation, looking at the style and the design of the cover. That is the respect in which it can be likened to How The Monk Got His Habit.
