User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712/@comment-188432-20121219163532: Difference between revisions
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Personally, I think they're miffed because that the top three entries on on Google's search list for the term "Senor 105" are ''our pages'' — two of which are discussion pages, not actual content. | Personally, I think they're miffed because that the top three entries on on Google's search list for the term "Senor 105" are ''our pages'' — two of which are discussion pages, not actual content. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
In other words, '''he started a page about his own creation''', which is one of the fundamental "no-no"s of wiki editing. I'm deleting and locking recreation. If anyone wants to recreate the page, they'll have to apply through admin, and thus we can verify it's not being written by people quite so close to it. In Wikipedia terms, the current state of the article exhibits clear {{w|Wikipedia:conflict of interest|conflict of interest}}, which necessitates its deletion. | In other words, '''he started a page about his own creation''', which is one of the fundamental "no-no"s of wiki editing. I'm deleting and locking recreation. If anyone wants to recreate the page, they'll have to apply through admin, and thus we can verify it's not being written by people quite so close to it. In Wikipedia terms, the current state of the article exhibits clear {{w|Wikipedia:conflict of interest|conflict of interest}}, which necessitates its deletion. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121208143712-88790/20121219163532-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:16, 28 April 2023
Personally, I think they're miffed because that the top three entries on on Google's search list for the term "Senor 105" are our pages — two of which are discussion pages, not actual content.
So let me help 'em out. I'm deleting all three pages, full stop. There's long been a note atop Talk:Señor 105 flatly stating that it was created by Cody Quijano-Schell — so all these edits are his — but that meant nothing to me, until Blair Bidmead pointed out on my talk page that he is the editor of the whole Señor 105 range. In fact, CQS is the creator of Señor 105.
In other words, he started a page about his own creation, which is one of the fundamental "no-no"s of wiki editing. I'm deleting and locking recreation. If anyone wants to recreate the page, they'll have to apply through admin, and thus we can verify it's not being written by people quite so close to it. In Wikipedia terms, the current state of the article exhibits clear conflict of interest, which necessitates its deletion.
