Howling:5 things to look for: 11: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
V00D00M0NKY (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Actually, that doesn't prove anything. Remember, the Doctor is visiting her backward in time. So, in her timeline (and presumably "normal time" through the 51st century), the Pandorica opened, then the first she heard of the cracks was at the Byzantium, and she hasn't yet seen the Doctor figure out what the cracks are (beyond what he figured out at the Byzantium). How is that a problem? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 19:58, May 22, 2010 (UTC) | :Actually, that doesn't prove anything. Remember, the Doctor is visiting her backward in time. So, in her timeline (and presumably "normal time" through the 51st century), the Pandorica opened, then the first she heard of the cracks was at the Byzantium, and she hasn't yet seen the Doctor figure out what the cracks are (beyond what he figured out at the Byzantium). How is that a problem? --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 19:58, May 22, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:"The cracks in the skin of the universe don't you know where they came from...The universe is cracked, the pandorica will open, silence will fall." I think that means that the pandorica did cause the cracks. [[User:V00D00M0NKY|V00D00M0NKY]] 20:24, May 22, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 22 May 2010
 
I have noticed 11 mentioned twice so far, in The Eleventh Hour (Do I need to point it out) and in Time of Angels, when the Doctor describes the planet he mentions an 11 hour day. Anything else?
Irrelevent. Sorryaboutthatchief 03:16, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
Irrelevant? How is it irrelevant? All of these forums are speculation, and if this is something I choose to point out, then it is not irrelevant. If you're going to put someone down, at least use the right word. Fan555 06:47, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
just ignore him. but this theory is a good one, but personally i dont think the number 11 will have something to do with it because its only been mentioned twice so far as you've said. we already know 3: Cracks, Pandorica and Silence. We just need the last 2, but your ida is good :) --Ooiue 07:12, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
- I said this on another page and i stick to it.. I think the cracks, pandorica, and silence would only be considered one thing being that the pandorica causes the cracks and the cracks cause the silence. V00D00M0NKY 07:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
Moffat said 5 things to look for, not 5 things to look for other than the cracks --Ooiue 12:25, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it's as good a theory as any other, at least if you can find evidence from the other 5 episodes. At this point, we've found at least 11 :) "things to look for", so obviously more than half of them will turn out to not be what the Moff and MS were talking about, but there's really no way to be sure which ones they are.... --Falcotron 11:45, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
The Pandorica didn't cause the cracks.
River Song says she already encountered the Pandorica, but she has no idea what the cracks are --Ghadius 18:49, May 22, 2010 (UTC)Ghadius
- Actually, that doesn't prove anything. Remember, the Doctor is visiting her backward in time. So, in her timeline (and presumably "normal time" through the 51st century), the Pandorica opened, then the first she heard of the cracks was at the Byzantium, and she hasn't yet seen the Doctor figure out what the cracks are (beyond what he figured out at the Byzantium). How is that a problem? --Falcotron 19:58, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
- "The cracks in the skin of the universe don't you know where they came from...The universe is cracked, the pandorica will open, silence will fall." I think that means that the pandorica did cause the cracks. V00D00M0NKY 20:24, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
