Talk:Have You Seen This Man? (short story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father.") Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father. | Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father. | ||
: If you read [[Ulysses#Legacy]], you will find that it is written in a way that explains the reader mistaking Nine for "his father". {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:51, 13 July 2023
Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father.
- If you read Ulysses#Legacy, you will find that it is written in a way that explains the reader mistaking Nine for "his father". 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
