Talk:Have You Seen This Man? (short story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father.
== Entry 32 ==
Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father. {{Unsigned-anon|87.71.65.59}}


: If you read [[Ulysses#Legacy]], you will find that it is written in a way that explains the reader mistaking Nine for "his father". {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
: If you read [[Ulysses#Legacy]], you will find that it is written in a way that explains the reader mistaking Nine for "his father". {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:52, 13 July 2023

Entry 32[[edit source]]

Wouldn't the reference to someone an unkonowing outsider considers the doctor's father (in entry 32) refer to it being far in history and the person assuming the doctor couldn't be inhumanly old and explaining it via a relative? I don't see why a page doing with apperances of the ninth doctor have to do with the character of his father. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.71.65.59 (talk).

If you read Ulysses#Legacy, you will find that it is written in a way that explains the reader mistaking Nine for "his father". 14:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)