Forum:TV Comic & other periodical issues: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit visualeditor-wikitext |
No edit summary Tag: visualeditor-wikitext |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[File:TVC 674 Front Cover Advertising Doctor Who.jpg|thumb|A cropped version of the cover, omitting the ''[[Popeye (series)|Popeye]]'' strip (and, in my opinion, thereby being less informative).]] | [[File:TVC 674 Front Cover Advertising Doctor Who.jpg|thumb|A cropped version of the cover, omitting the ''[[Popeye (series)|Popeye]]'' strip (and, in my opinion, thereby being less informative).]] | ||
Right, so a while ago, [[User:OttselSpy25|another user on this site]] went through various issues of ''[[TV Comic]]'' which featured ''[[Doctor Who]]''-related content, and made pages for them. Admin [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] later decided that they didn't deserve pages due to not being released under the ''Doctor Who'' brand, and deleted the pages, redirecting them to a [[TV Comic/Covers|list of covers]]. Additionally, said list of covers only features the very top banners of these issues, with the article claiming that "Because of the lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki, these galleries will mainly function to cover the top banner of the issue.". Personally, I quite strongly disagree. First off, in terms of a "lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki"... we now have [[Popeye (series)|an overview for ''Popeye'']]. And secondly, the full covers would allow the issues to be more easily identifiable (and be more in line with how issues of other periodicals are covered). | Right, so a while ago, [[User:OttselSpy25|another user on this site]] went through various issues of ''[[TV Comic]]'' which featured ''[[Doctor Who]]''-related content, and made pages for them. Admin [[User:CzechOut|CzechOut]] later decided that they didn't deserve pages due to not being released under the ''Doctor Who'' brand, and deleted the pages, redirecting them to a [[TV Comic/Covers|list of covers]]. Additionally, said list of covers only features the very top banners of these issues, with the article claiming that "Because of the lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki, these galleries will mainly function to cover the top banner of the issue.". Personally, I quite strongly disagree. First off, in terms of a "lack of a need of ''Popeye'' content on this wiki"... we now have [[Popeye (series)|an overview for ''Popeye'']]. And secondly, the full covers would allow the issues to be more easily identifiable (and be more in line with how issues of other periodicals are covered). | ||
[[File:BeanoMAX 1.jpg|left|thumb|Sure, it isn't ''[[Doctor Who Magazine]]'', but ''come on''. ([[BM 1]])]] | |||
Additionally, the idea that the covers couldn't be featured on the site would also suggest that all non-''Doctor Who''-branded periodicals from ''[[TV Century 21]]'' to ''[[BeanoMAX]]'' couldn't be properly illustrated either, at least for specific issues (although these do often advertise the ''DW'' content on their covers... but so does ''TV Comic''!). Although the decision that ''TVC''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s issues couldn't have pages wasn't the result of a forum decision, I feel that a forum thread would allow this issue to be resolved if consensus is reached, as a single individual's choice generally cannot override forum consensus. | Additionally, the idea that the covers couldn't be featured on the site would also suggest that all non-''Doctor Who''-branded periodicals from ''[[TV Century 21]]'' to ''[[BeanoMAX]]'' couldn't be properly illustrated either, at least for specific issues (although these do often advertise the ''DW'' content on their covers... but so does ''TV Comic''!). Although the decision that ''TVC''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s issues couldn't have pages wasn't the result of a forum decision, I feel that a forum thread would allow this issue to be resolved if consensus is reached, as a single individual's choice generally cannot override forum consensus. | ||
Revision as of 15:46, 17 September 2023
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Opening post
Right, so a while ago, another user on this site went through various issues of TV Comic which featured Doctor Who-related content, and made pages for them. Admin CzechOut later decided that they didn't deserve pages due to not being released under the Doctor Who brand, and deleted the pages, redirecting them to a list of covers. Additionally, said list of covers only features the very top banners of these issues, with the article claiming that "Because of the lack of a need of Popeye content on this wiki, these galleries will mainly function to cover the top banner of the issue.". Personally, I quite strongly disagree. First off, in terms of a "lack of a need of Popeye content on this wiki"... we now have an overview for Popeye. And secondly, the full covers would allow the issues to be more easily identifiable (and be more in line with how issues of other periodicals are covered).
Additionally, the idea that the covers couldn't be featured on the site would also suggest that all non-Doctor Who-branded periodicals from TV Century 21 to BeanoMAX couldn't be properly illustrated either, at least for specific issues (although these do often advertise the DW content on their covers... but so does TV Comic!). Although the decision that TVC's issues couldn't have pages wasn't the result of a forum decision, I feel that a forum thread would allow this issue to be resolved if consensus is reached, as a single individual's choice generally cannot override forum consensus.
So, tl;dr, my proposal is as follows: any issue of a periodical which features licensed DWU content should be given a page, with its full cover shown (this may also apply to documentary-esque periodicals which could be useful for behind-the-scenes citation, but that's a separate issue). So, what are people's thoughts on this? Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 15:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Discussion
Wholeheartedly agree with this opening post. Something a single admin decided years ago in a lost part of the Wiki without any input from other users, which not only doesn't hold up to current practise and, frankly, is therefore completely unenforceable under T:LOCAL RULES... we absolutely should official overturn this bizarre decision. Of course we should have pages on individual issues of magazines that contain DWU content; it's a step away from redirecting any anthology without DWU branding to the overall series page.
15:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Completely agree with everything here, we should totally have pages for individual issues of stuff featuring DWU content. Aquanafrahudy 📢 15:46, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
