Talk:Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Done. Although I'm still not entirely happy with it. And the article still needs to say more about paradoxes (and FP, Reapers, Amy fading out like Back to the Future, etc.). --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 22:31, June 4, 2010 (UTC) | :Done. Although I'm still not entirely happy with it. And the article still needs to say more about paradoxes (and FP, Reapers, Amy fading out like Back to the Future, etc.). --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 22:31, June 4, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Nice work. Paradoxes are dealt with on their own article [[Temporal paradox]] (I've added this to the see also section). Also be careful adding real world science into the articles, the stuff about Einsteinian views of time etc, is interesting but needs to be backed up by an in-universe source (and should really start with 'a view Human scientists had...'). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 03:45, June 5, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:45, 5 June 2010
Rewrite[[edit source]]
I attempted to put together everything we actually know about time in the Whoniverse and organize it into a coherent whole.
I wasn't sure how to fit alternate timelines into the article, so I left them out for now. Hopefully I'll come up with a way later. --Falcotron 22:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Although I'm still not entirely happy with it. And the article still needs to say more about paradoxes (and FP, Reapers, Amy fading out like Back to the Future, etc.). --Falcotron 22:31, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Nice work. Paradoxes are dealt with on their own article Temporal paradox (I've added this to the see also section). Also be careful adding real world science into the articles, the stuff about Einsteinian views of time etc, is interesting but needs to be backed up by an in-universe source (and should really start with 'a view Human scientists had...'). --Tangerineduel 03:45, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
