Category talk:Human images: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "Is the intended use case for this category all images of human characters that don't otherwise have enough images to have their own category? Also, should this category have every human character image category as a subcategory (like how numerous other species-specific image categories seem to operate)? ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Intended use == | |||
Is the intended use case for this category all images of human characters that don't otherwise have enough images to have their own category? Also, should this category have every human character image category as a subcategory (like how numerous other species-specific image categories seem to operate)? [[User:Look-a-troopa|Look-a-troopa]] [[User talk:Look-a-troopa|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC) | Is the intended use case for this category all images of human characters that don't otherwise have enough images to have their own category? Also, should this category have every human character image category as a subcategory (like how numerous other species-specific image categories seem to operate)? [[User:Look-a-troopa|Look-a-troopa]] [[User talk:Look-a-troopa|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
: This category possibly violates [[T:OVER-CAT]], specifically as an example of being "too broad". Though I don't have any strong opinions there. But if it is allowed, then yes, other categories for photos of specific humans should be placed here. [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:45, 31 March 2024
Intended use
Is the intended use case for this category all images of human characters that don't otherwise have enough images to have their own category? Also, should this category have every human character image category as a subcategory (like how numerous other species-specific image categories seem to operate)? Look-a-troopa ☎ 02:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- This category possibly violates T:OVER-CAT, specifically as an example of being "too broad". Though I don't have any strong opinions there. But if it is allowed, then yes, other categories for photos of specific humans should be placed here. Danochy ☎ 02:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
