Talk:Rose Tyler

Time paradox

On the end of time rose meets the tenth doctor . when the ecleston regenerates into tennant wouldnt this create a time paradox? K-9 mark 5 19:22, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

I don't believe so, because Rose hadn't met the Doctor yet when he visited her at The End of Time.66.103.119.88 23:47, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Recent Revert

I reverted the article back to before the "Haters Gonna hate" spam. It ruins the article 68.5.246.171 01:20, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hath Monster Files?

Someone added this to the list of Rose Returns appearances. I've watched the Doctor's Daughter multiple times and there's no sign of Rose in the episode. If "Hath Monster Files" refers to a non-televised appearance (perhaps in a comic strip?), then this needs to be indicated. 23skidoo 02:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

IT MEANS THE MONSTER FILES ON THE WEBSITE

Rose, miss her, she is an awesome companion

Can't wait for her return, she rocks!

Rose/Bad Wolf/How The Heck did she Survive it!

the Master refers to the Doctor having had a companion who could absorb the Time Vortex, however in context it obvious means others couldn't. So lets see, my questions are thus: 1 - Could she survive taking it in again, you know, had she stuck around to do so - B, no wait 2 - It killed the 9th Doctor just holding it in him for all of 30 seconds, and he's putting it back at the end of that 30-odd seconds, but Rose has it for 5 minutes. In the context of what the Master said, that's saying something special about Rose. One last thing, about her teleporting between realities below in another section.

The Doctor held the time vortex for longer than 30 seconds. You have to remember she feel asleep/went unconscious for a while, that could have been a few minutes or a few hours. ThePolarity 19:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Travelling between Universes

In Stolen Earth, just 4 minutes in where she apepars and looks up and says, "Right, Now we're in trouble." the effect is different from how they travelled before in Army of Ghosts and Doomsday - Also, in the same season, She disappears like a ghost some times, and others disappears in a flash of light. In Turn left for instance, just after alt-Donna's first meeting with her, She fades out with none of the flashy stuff. infact the first time theres the flashy stuff is when alt-donna meets her for the 2nd time, both appear and disappear. Its when she firs tells donna that she also just fades out - Whats with that? - AlexMcpherson who really should register.

Not sure if that's a discrepancy...

Regarding: "The 27th April birthdate is also inconsistent with a statement on the BBC's website: during the lead-up to the episode "Bad Wolf," the website was altered to tie in with the story's Big Brother theme, and a "contestant portrait" for Rose stated that she was an Aries, which is March 21 to April 19. (This of course is fairly irrelevant, as it simply means that whoever did the "contestant portrait" made a mistake regarding either her birthday or when the astrological sign of Aries is commonly accepted to be.) "

Has anyone actually checked whether or not the sun is in the sign of Aries 27th of April in the year 200100? There is, after all, procession of the equinoxes to take into account, and as I understand it the date on which a sun sign ends progresses further into the year each year, albeit very slowly. If, by the year 200081, they have adjusted the dates, then it's very possible, even likely, that the year of birth that would be assumed for a 19-year-old girl in 200100, given her birthday on April 27th, would very certainly be in the sign of Aries. Additionally, since Rose would have never volunteered this information, it could have been extrapolated from a cellular sample. In that case, it could be inaccurate for all sorts of reasons, not limited to background temporal radiation or the fact that you quite simply cannot use any form of cellular chronological dating technique on something that has travelled through time. 173.12.172.149 00:38, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Living Alone?

Weren't the events of DW: Stolen Earth/Journey's End rewritten? Wouldn't of the Duplicate Doctor never been made? ~ BillyWilliam3rd

Series 5

In the behind the scenes section it says that Billie Piper was seen filming for series 5. As far as I can tell, both articles imply that the episode they were filming for was the Beast Below, which she didn't appear in. What with the cracks erasing events, I wouldn't put it past Moffat to have the story planned that she was on board the ship and just missed him (and they filmed that scene at the same time etc). But since it looks unlikely that she'll be appearing, should we remove it, as it seems she was just visiting the set. The Thirteenth Doctor 17:23, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

it could be due to the fact that the Doctor goes back in time to the Beast Below's events with Rose. that theory of Doctor in every episode from the finale is quite common and is supported in Flesh and Stone when he is seen comferting Amy telling her to remember with his jacket on, despite the fact that in previous scene he lost it and and next scene he still hasnt got it Ooiue 17:32, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

It isn't impossible, but we're talking about a 6-month-old rumor that's never again been substantiated, and that would imply that Hawthorne from The Beast Below is the main villain of the finale. It seems much more likely that Billie Piper stopped by to say hello (does a floral print dress sound more like "Rose costume" or "real-life Billie"?), or that someone who just looked vaguely like her was mistaken for her, or that the whole thing was a hoax from someone who just wanted attention.

For posterity, here's the references: http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/Doctor-Rose-Abbey-filming/article-1328892-detail/article.html http://www.doctorwho.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16:doctor-who-sightings&catid=1:newsitems&Itemid=3

Anyway, I removed it. --Falcotron 19:05, June 9, 2010 (UTC)