Talk:Impersonation

T:NO RW violation

Yeah, fair enough. I was mostly looking at the article for straight, but that's not a foolproof method if the actual policy disagrees.

Would it work to restructure this as a simple list of cases where the concept appears, like at handbag, for example? I was mostly careful to only use sources where the actual word is used. Or is anything more general than direct quotes a policy violation? I'm genuinely unsure.

jsmith5504^{talk to me} 23:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I mean, the Romans example doesn't use the actual word, just for instance, so that should go at bare minimum. (Part of the problem here is that Forum:Loosening T:NO RW is due to be closed, as everything is just in limbo.) Najawin ☎ 00:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh, absolutely. That's why I said "mostly". I'm also not sure about the Revelation of the Daleks ^[+]Loading...["Revelation of the Daleks (novelisation)"] example, since I copied that from JJ33 verbatim, but all the rest should be fine... if the principle holds.

jsmith5504^{talk to me} 00:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

I believe the Meglos section is also out, at least. Najawin ☎ 00:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)