Talk:Violet: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Fennel Soup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Eh? What are you talking about? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | : Eh? What are you talking about? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
::The Saurian picture on this page is being used to indicate what violet looks like, but it comes from an Annual short story. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | ::The Saurian picture on this page is being used to indicate what violet looks like, but it comes from an Annual short story. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm not an authority, but I was recently looking at [[Forum:Temporary_forums/Overhauling_image_policies]] for another reason, and I don't get the sense that anything is wrong with the citation of this image, or even that the usage of cover art is disallowed. (Associated [[T:ICC]] note calls cover art "acceptable as illustration".) Given the forum's conclusion "promotional images that are essentially illustrations that happened not to be packaged with the story itself should be valid, cited to the story they apply to", then an illustration that ''was'' part of a story's original publication seems firmly within bounds. [[User:Fennel Soup|Fennel Soup]] [[User talk:Fennel Soup|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 10 October 2024
Saurians
Do we consider Annual pictures to be accurate depictions of the stories? We don't consider cover art, I know. Najawin ☎ 06:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Eh? What are you talking about? --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 09:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Saurian picture on this page is being used to indicate what violet looks like, but it comes from an Annual short story. Najawin ☎ 17:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not an authority, but I was recently looking at Forum:Temporary_forums/Overhauling_image_policies for another reason, and I don't get the sense that anything is wrong with the citation of this image, or even that the usage of cover art is disallowed. (Associated T:ICC note calls cover art "acceptable as illustration".) Given the forum's conclusion "promotional images that are essentially illustrations that happened not to be packaged with the story itself should be valid, cited to the story they apply to", then an illustration that was part of a story's original publication seems firmly within bounds. Fennel Soup ☎ 19:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Saurian picture on this page is being used to indicate what violet looks like, but it comes from an Annual short story. Najawin ☎ 17:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
