Talk:Chitauri: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: Huh. I don't think I agree with the practice, but I'd be interested to see what other people think. It's only one step away from using a subtitled screencap from a TV episode. [[User:Jack|Jack]] [[User talk:Jack|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | :: Huh. I don't think I agree with the practice, but I'd be interested to see what other people think. It's only one step away from using a subtitled screencap from a TV episode. [[User:Jack|Jack]] [[User talk:Jack|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: Yeah, I have to agree with Jack here. The deviation from common practice makes it confusing (for example at first glance here, I thought star lord was a Chitauri). [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:08, 18 October 2024
Infobox
Is it worth having the infobox image if it, a) doesn't depict the article's subject and, b) is longer than the article itself? Jack ☎ 20:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've been using infobox images of elements being mentioned, with an explanatory caption, on a fair few articles (e.g. Wile E. Coyote), so I do personally think they're more helpful than not having them. As for the image's height, that's just because the panel it's from is vertical, although it probably could be cropped a bit shorter, since Rocket's not overly important to the image. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 20:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
