Talk:Attack: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Fennel Soup (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Part of the word does appear in the source, so I feel like that's probably enough for a conjecture page - the word has surely been used elsewhere in stuff we cover, though. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | : Part of the word does appear in the source, so I feel like that's probably enough for a conjecture page - the word has surely been used elsewhere in stuff we cover, though. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
::To be clear, I'm not saying that the existence of the conjecturally titled page ''[[Hercules Attacks]]'' is a problem. I'm saying that this page ("[[Attack]]") should not use a conjectural instance of the verb "attacks" as its only/lead example for various reasons. As you've just mentioned, there are certainly actual instances of "attack" out there that we could use instead. [[User:Fennel Soup|Fennel Soup]] [[User talk:Fennel Soup|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 17 November 2024
Conjecture problems
Leaving a quick note: I don't think that a conjectural title should be used to form the basis of a concept page like this. Verb/noun policies aside, the word "attacks" isn’t even fully visible in the given example. Fennel Soup ☎ 22:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Part of the word does appear in the source, so I feel like that's probably enough for a conjecture page - the word has surely been used elsewhere in stuff we cover, though. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 22:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm not saying that the existence of the conjecturally titled page Hercules Attacks is a problem. I'm saying that this page ("Attack") should not use a conjectural instance of the verb "attacks" as its only/lead example for various reasons. As you've just mentioned, there are certainly actual instances of "attack" out there that we could use instead. Fennel Soup ☎ 23:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
