Forum:Request block template: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (rep) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->I think it would be good to have a "request block" template. This could be a non visible template placed on user talk pages for those who are vandalising etc, the wiki. Right now we have to warn them, a few times, then report to an admin. If an admin is not available at that time, then the person may run riot through the wiki, vandalising at will. Personally, I really only know of [[User:Tangerineduel]] as an admin, so all my blocking requests go to them. If this template was made, I'm sure that all admins would be able to see which pages use it, then check each of the users out to see if the block is required. This would not depend on one specific admin logging on to fix the problem, but the first available admin will be able to fix it. Thoughts? [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 22:24, July 27, 2010 (UTC) | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->I think it would be good to have a "request block" template. This could be a non visible template placed on user talk pages for those who are vandalising etc, the wiki. Right now we have to warn them, a few times, then report to an admin. If an admin is not available at that time, then the person may run riot through the wiki, vandalising at will. Personally, I really only know of [[User:Tangerineduel]] as an admin, so all my blocking requests go to them. If this template was made, I'm sure that all admins would be able to see which pages use it, then check each of the users out to see if the block is required. This would not depend on one specific admin logging on to fix the problem, but the first available admin will be able to fix it. Thoughts? [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 22:24, July 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:For admins, see [[Tardis:Administrators]]. | :For admins, see [[Tardis:Administrators]]. Just as an FYI. | ||
:For the template, it wouldn't work with anons, since they can't have user pages. | :For the template, it wouldn't work with anons, since they can't have user pages. But in general, it could work to add a category that is marked hidden. -- [[User:Sulfur|sulfur]] 01:47, July 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::But they have talk pages. Would that not work? --[[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:58, July 29, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:58, 29 July 2010
Index → Panopticon → Request block template
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I think it would be good to have a "request block" template. This could be a non visible template placed on user talk pages for those who are vandalising etc, the wiki. Right now we have to warn them, a few times, then report to an admin. If an admin is not available at that time, then the person may run riot through the wiki, vandalising at will. Personally, I really only know of User:Tangerineduel as an admin, so all my blocking requests go to them. If this template was made, I'm sure that all admins would be able to see which pages use it, then check each of the users out to see if the block is required. This would not depend on one specific admin logging on to fix the problem, but the first available admin will be able to fix it. Thoughts? The Thirteenth Doctor 22:24, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- For admins, see Tardis:Administrators. Just as an FYI.
- For the template, it wouldn't work with anons, since they can't have user pages. But in general, it could work to add a category that is marked hidden. -- sulfur 01:47, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- But they have talk pages. Would that not work? --The Thirteenth Doctor 11:58, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
