5
edits
Line 688: | Line 688: | ||
:So, apparently in that reality Richard Dawkins belongs to something called a 'Star Cult' or at least speaks on their behalf. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 11:36, June 30, 2010 (UTC) | :So, apparently in that reality Richard Dawkins belongs to something called a 'Star Cult' or at least speaks on their behalf. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 11:36, June 30, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe a bit of bias in the description of Dawkins? - Many don't consider Dawkins as inflammatory or his beliefs as unusual.[[User:Baziel|Baziel]] 20:01, July 27, 2010 (UTC) | :Maybe a bit of bias in the description of Dawkins? - Many don't consider Dawkins as inflammatory or his beliefs as unusual.[[User:Baziel|Baziel]] 20:01, July 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:<br> | |||
:I think it makes a classic juxtaposition. In a world where there is an observable Universe, Dawkins' claims regarding science are seen a "rational." In a world without an observable Universe, those same claims would be regarded as irrational and baseless. [[User:Jaiotu|Jaiotu]] 10:22, July 28, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Spelling error == | == Spelling error == |
edits