Howling:Is the Midnight Entity the Silence?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Is it? Because The Midnight Entity was an External Unknown Force Capable of Penetrating Things Without damage! It Had No Voice Before Possessing Sky So When Around it You Would Hear Nothing But Silence. It Had a Grudge against the Doctor and Would Probably Want to Gain Revenge... And What Revenge is Better than Blowing Up the TARDIS and Causing Total Event Collapse. So What do you think?[[User:Liamhenney|Liamhenney]] 11:19, August 11, 2010 (UTC) | Is it? Because The Midnight Entity was an External Unknown Force Capable of Penetrating Things Without damage! It Had No Voice Before Possessing Sky So When Around it You Would Hear Nothing But Silence. It Had a Grudge against the Doctor and Would Probably Want to Gain Revenge... And What Revenge is Better than Blowing Up the TARDIS and Causing Total Event Collapse. So What do you think?[[User:Liamhenney|Liamhenney]] 11:19, August 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
You know, it's | You know, it's very possible. The only thoery that makes any sense, with the exception that it's (most likely) something new. But if it were anything seen before, it would only make sense to be the mysterious being who had no voice and no corperal form. They're very similar entities, from what we know. | ||
But I'm going to say it's probably something new. Bt this is a great side-thoery or alternate thoery that doesn't really have any fanwank cravings (a disease of unoriginality in Doctor Who thoorsing -- in my opinion), and no contradictions or errors. I would hope it's true, simply because the Midight entity was a great idea, and I always wondered if, as if was already non-corperal, it was still out there. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 12:39, August 11, 2010 (UTC) | But I'm going to say it's probably something new. Bt this is a great side-thoery or alternate thoery that doesn't really have any fanwank cravings (a disease of unoriginality in Doctor Who thoorsing -- in my opinion), and no contradictions or errors. I would hope it's true, simply because the Midight entity was a great idea, and I always wondered if, as if was already non-corperal, it was still out there. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 12:39, August 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
By fanwank, I refer to those who constatly insist - every single year - that if there is an enemy, it must be an enemy from the classic series, any in paticular that has been featured a number of times. Now, THAT is true fanwanking. | By fanwank, I refer to those who constatly insist - every single year - that if there is an enemy, it must be an enemy from the classic series, any in paticular that has been featured a number of times. Now, THAT is true fanwanking. | ||
And, since you seem to dumb to get the point through you thick skull, I said t would be the only thing that makes any remote sense at all if it were something that had been seen before, in thoery. But that I ''doubt'' it is anything ever seen before. Idiot. | And, since you seem to dumb to get the point through you thick skull, I said t would be the only thing that makes any remote sense at all if it were something that had been seen before, in thoery. But that I ''doubt'' it is anything ever seen before. Idiot. Fanwankers are those who will say the same thig every single year, insiting a recurring classic villain will return. | ||
The Rani = insitsted every year since 2005, people still insist it. The same applies to people refusing to give in that Omega is NOT returing. They thought it for series 5, didn't happen. So now they think it's for series 6, won't happen. Fanwanking at its more annoying. They only believe that becase of stupid rumours, which makes it all the more worser. | The Rani = insitsted every year since 2005, people still insist it. The same applies to people refusing to give in that Omega is NOT returing. They thought it for series 5, didn't happen. So now they think it's for series 6, won't happen. Fanwanking at its more annoying. They only believe that becase of stupid rumours, which makes it all the more worser. | ||
The most likely case is that the "big bad" is something new, knwing Steven Moffat. But, people will still insit it's Omega/The Monk/The Rani, as is the case every single year since 2005.[[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 09:27, August 12, 2010 (UTC) | The most likely case is that the "big bad" is something new, knwing Steven Moffat. But, people will still insit it's Omega/The Monk/The Rani, as is the case every single year since 2005.[[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 09:27, August 12, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 12 August 2010
Is it? Because The Midnight Entity was an External Unknown Force Capable of Penetrating Things Without damage! It Had No Voice Before Possessing Sky So When Around it You Would Hear Nothing But Silence. It Had a Grudge against the Doctor and Would Probably Want to Gain Revenge... And What Revenge is Better than Blowing Up the TARDIS and Causing Total Event Collapse. So What do you think?Liamhenney 11:19, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
You know, it's very possible. The only thoery that makes any sense, with the exception that it's (most likely) something new. But if it were anything seen before, it would only make sense to be the mysterious being who had no voice and no corperal form. They're very similar entities, from what we know.
But I'm going to say it's probably something new. Bt this is a great side-thoery or alternate thoery that doesn't really have any fanwank cravings (a disease of unoriginality in Doctor Who thoorsing -- in my opinion), and no contradictions or errors. I would hope it's true, simply because the Midight entity was a great idea, and I always wondered if, as if was already non-corperal, it was still out there. Delton Menace 12:39, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
How is that in any way not "fan wanking"? They will not bring back some random enemy who was in 1 episode. Silence obviously means it causes silence, not that it sometimes is silent. An D it wouldnt have anything against the doc because he didn't stop it. It
Delton Menace, you are the biggest perpetrator of fanwanking I've ever seen, so don't you dare make a statement like that.207.6.71.206 06:47, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
By fanwank, I refer to those who constatly insist - every single year - that if there is an enemy, it must be an enemy from the classic series, any in paticular that has been featured a number of times. Now, THAT is true fanwanking.
And, since you seem to dumb to get the point through you thick skull, I said t would be the only thing that makes any remote sense at all if it were something that had been seen before, in thoery. But that I doubt it is anything ever seen before. Idiot. Fanwankers are those who will say the same thig every single year, insiting a recurring classic villain will return.
The Rani = insitsted every year since 2005, people still insist it. The same applies to people refusing to give in that Omega is NOT returing. They thought it for series 5, didn't happen. So now they think it's for series 6, won't happen. Fanwanking at its more annoying. They only believe that becase of stupid rumours, which makes it all the more worser.
The most likely case is that the "big bad" is something new, knwing Steven Moffat. But, people will still insit it's Omega/The Monk/The Rani, as is the case every single year since 2005.Delton Menace 09:27, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
