Forum:Suggested Changes to TV Story Infobox: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}} | {{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Just a couple of thoughts... | Just a couple of thoughts... | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Hmm, and listing them in the infobox would get problematic for "[[The Daleks' Master Plan]]." Storylinks in the infobox would at least make for easier edits. | :Hmm, and listing them in the infobox would get problematic for "[[The Daleks' Master Plan]]." Storylinks in the infobox would at least make for easier edits. | ||
--[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 22:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | --[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 22:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Archivist's notes== | |||
Mantrid's suggestion did carry the day, but the day was so long ago, this thread probably doesn't make much sense to modern users of the site. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''14:15:12 Mon '''30 May 2011 </span> |
Revision as of 14:15, 30 May 2011
Template:Forum archives header Just a couple of thoughts... Firstly, do we really need to list all the individual episode titles for the Hartnell stories under the 'Format' section of the infobox? As the plot details are added for each story all the titles will show up in the navigation box anyway. Secondly, I'm beginning to think that it would be more useful to have the previous and next story links at the bottom of the infobox rather than at the bottom of the page. What do we think? --Mantrid 07:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, and listing them in the infobox would get problematic for "The Daleks' Master Plan." Storylinks in the infobox would at least make for easier edits.
--Freethinker1of1 22:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Archivist's notes
Mantrid's suggestion did carry the day, but the day was so long ago, this thread probably doesn't make much sense to modern users of the site.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">14:15:12 Mon 30 May 2011