Forum:Section stub: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I've tried making use of the section stub template on pages where only one section is in need of major addition, for example the plot on [[State of Decay]]. I think this is a better way to identify areas for addition but would like to know if it's what others want?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 19:46, September 25, 2010 (UTC) | I've tried making use of the section stub template on pages where only one section is in need of major addition, for example the plot on [[State of Decay]]. I think this is a better way to identify areas for addition but would like to know if it's what others want?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 19:46, September 25, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I think all TV stub, should have the TV stub template on them, as a way to identify them easily. But I think the section stub works very well with it, as some User may not know why certain pages are stubs, so putting the section stub on them does make scene. Or we could edit the TV stub template so that User's leave a message on the stub, like the <nowiki>{{proposed deletion}}</nowiki>. For example a User would see a TV page that is a stub, and put <nowiki>{{TV stub|Plot}}</nowiki>. It seems a bit strange to try to replace the TV stub with a section stub that places the article in the stub category, instead of the TV stub category... [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 19:51, September 25, 2010 (UTC) | :I think all TV stub, should have the TV stub template on them, as a way to identify them easily. But I think the section stub works very well with it, as some User may not know why certain pages are stubs, so putting the section stub on them does make scene. Or we could edit the TV stub template so that User's leave a message on the stub, like the <nowiki>{{proposed deletion}}</nowiki>. For example a User would see a TV page that is a stub, and put <nowiki>{{TV stub|Plot}}</nowiki>. It seems a bit strange to try to replace the TV stub with a section stub that places the article in the stub category, instead of the TV stub category... [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 19:51, September 25, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I agree, I think this could be a neat way to add to the existing stub templates rather than replacing them. [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 11:33, September 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:33, 26 September 2010
Index → Panopticon → Section stub
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I've tried making use of the section stub template on pages where only one section is in need of major addition, for example the plot on State of Decay. I think this is a better way to identify areas for addition but would like to know if it's what others want?--Skittles the hog 19:46, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- I think all TV stub, should have the TV stub template on them, as a way to identify them easily. But I think the section stub works very well with it, as some User may not know why certain pages are stubs, so putting the section stub on them does make scene. Or we could edit the TV stub template so that User's leave a message on the stub, like the {{proposed deletion}}. For example a User would see a TV page that is a stub, and put {{TV stub|Plot}}. It seems a bit strange to try to replace the TV stub with a section stub that places the article in the stub category, instead of the TV stub category... Mini-mitch 19:51, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, I think this could be a neat way to add to the existing stub templates rather than replacing them. Rob T Firefly 11:33, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
