Forum:Relative index of timelines: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
(where's the sort number?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The "Category:Eras" page talks about an attempt to place various eras and timelines into a coherent stream with a numeric reference on various other articles. However, none of those articles seem to have such numbers. Was this attempt abandoned? If not, I'd love to see an article that still has the numbering. If so, then the Category page should be rewritten to remove that system. -- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] 04:57, January 21, 2011 (UTC) | The "Category:Eras" page talks about an attempt to place various eras and timelines into a coherent stream with a numeric reference on various other articles. However, none of those articles seem to have such numbers. Was this attempt abandoned? If not, I'd love to see an article that still has the numbering. If so, then the Category page should be rewritten to remove that system. -- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] 04:57, January 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I think you've only skimmed the text, because that's a fairly fundamental misread of it. As a category page, the text is referring to the way the ''category'' is set up; not the way the ''articles within the category'' are written. The attempt hasn't, therefore, been ''abandoned''. It's been finished. You'll note that the category isn't alphabetized for the most part; rather, it's organized by the numerical system described. <span style="background:#cc3333; border:1px dotted #777777; padding:1px 3px 1px 3px; margin-left:4px; font-size:85%;-moz-border-radius:5px;">'''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="color:#b7b7ff; cursor:help" title="Don't worry.">czech</span><span style="color:#dbd8ff" title="I'm a force for good.">out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|<font color="#ffffff" title="Talk to me">☎</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font color="#ffffff" title="See what I've been up to">✍</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/CzechBot|<font color="#ffffff" title="Czech up on the bot"></font>]]</span> 16:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC) | :I think you've only skimmed the text, because that's a fairly fundamental misread of it. As a category page, the text is referring to the way the ''category'' is set up; not the way the ''articles within the category'' are written. The attempt hasn't, therefore, been ''abandoned''. It's been finished. You'll note that the category isn't alphabetized for the most part; rather, it's organized by the numerical system described. <span style="background:#cc3333; border:1px dotted #777777; padding:1px 3px 1px 3px; margin-left:4px; font-size:85%;-moz-border-radius:5px;">'''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="color:#b7b7ff; cursor:help" title="Don't worry.">czech</span><span style="color:#dbd8ff" title="I'm a force for good.">out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|<font color="#ffffff" title="Talk to me">☎</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font color="#ffffff" title="See what I've been up to">✍</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/CzechBot|<font color="#ffffff" title="Czech up on the bot"></font>]]</span> 16:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Is that Sort Number accessible by the creators/editors? I see two outside the number system already, and I'm about to create a third. -- [[User:Gousha|Gousha]] 19:57, January 23, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:57, 23 January 2011
Index → Panopticon → Relative index of timelines
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
The "Category:Eras" page talks about an attempt to place various eras and timelines into a coherent stream with a numeric reference on various other articles. However, none of those articles seem to have such numbers. Was this attempt abandoned? If not, I'd love to see an article that still has the numbering. If so, then the Category page should be rewritten to remove that system. -- Gousha 04:57, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- I think you've only skimmed the text, because that's a fairly fundamental misread of it. As a category page, the text is referring to the way the category is set up; not the way the articles within the category are written. The attempt hasn't, therefore, been abandoned. It's been finished. You'll note that the category isn't alphabetized for the most part; rather, it's organized by the numerical system described. czechout ☎ ✍ 16:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Is that Sort Number accessible by the creators/editors? I see two outside the number system already, and I'm about to create a third. -- Gousha 19:57, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
