Forum:Comic previews: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
No, but I think Tangerine mentioned that it was a DWM artist. However, they likely had instruction from BF.--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:41, February 3, 2011 (UTC) | No, but I think Tangerine mentioned that it was a DWM artist. However, they likely had instruction from BF.--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:41, February 3, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The issue of whether the artist is BF or DWM is spurious. They're all publishing under license of the BBC, which is what matters to in-universe status. At the end of the day, it's licensed art, no matter who draws it. I think they're more in-universe than covers, because the comic artist is actually trying to represent the story in question. BF covers are, by the admission of people involved (like [[Lisa Bowerman]]) little more than photos of actors. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | |||
Revision as of 17:34, 3 February 2011
Index → Panopticon → Comic previews
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Are comic previews in-universe? Some, such as the one from The Holy Terror, appear so. However, they are not offical images for the audio and so it is debatable. I previously questioned this (as you can see on my talk page) but it never came to a conclusion.--Skittles the hog--Talk 16:34, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
Well they are official images, coming from DWM, but I'm uncertain whether they come from BF or just one of DWM's comic artists. Does anyone have an issue to hand so that we could find out? --Revan\Talk 16:37, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
No, but I think Tangerine mentioned that it was a DWM artist. However, they likely had instruction from BF.--Skittles the hog--Talk 16:41, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
- The issue of whether the artist is BF or DWM is spurious. They're all publishing under license of the BBC, which is what matters to in-universe status. At the end of the day, it's licensed art, no matter who draws it. I think they're more in-universe than covers, because the comic artist is actually trying to represent the story in question. BF covers are, by the admission of people involved (like Lisa Bowerman) little more than photos of actors.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
