Forum:Rumours on the loose: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of [[tardis:spoiler policy#rumours]] behind you. Who's going to "murder" you? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} |
Revision as of 19:32, 22 February 2011
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I keep on noticing different things with the word rumoured in it on the Series 6 page, OUTSIDE the section appropriatly named rumours. I mean, in Episode Notes it says:
- A rumoured synopsis of Rebel Flesh and Gangers has been released..........
- It is rumoured that Series 6 will begin on the 9th April 2011
and on Episodes it says:
- Night Terrors (rumoured)
I mean, this is just silly. Rumours belong where rumours are supposed to be. I thought this was in the policy. Please can an admin just delete them because I bet that if I did it, I would get murdered, so really, please just make it clear that you CAN'T add rumours where rumours aren't supposed to be..... If I got the policy stuff wrong, you can murder me. Oh no, you're gonna ban me for saying that.
Ghastly9090 16:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really see a discussion here. Just statements. Tidy it up if it getting overrun.----Skittles the hog--Talk 16:11, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
- Could you please expand a bit on your thoughts, Ghastly? I'm not quite understanding what you'd like for admin to do that you can't. I mean, I agree that the things you're finding are wrong — rumours shouldn't be out of their section — but I'm not sure why you're feeling you can't make the edits yourself. You have the full weight of tardis:spoiler policy#rumours behind you. Who's going to "murder" you?