Forum:Doctorwhospoilers.com is not a valid resource: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Y'know, I don't really go to the series 6 page so m...") |
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Remember, just because you can find ''a'' reference on the internet doesn't mean it's a ''good'' reference. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''19:02:01 Mon '''28 Mar 2011 </span> | Remember, just because you can find ''a'' reference on the internet doesn't mean it's a ''good'' reference. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''19:02:01 Mon '''28 Mar 2011 </span> | ||
:It should only be added to the ''rumour'' section if it mentions an official Twitter etc. It is a forum site, and I've been on it when it said a member of a forums came up with idea X', which I just ignored. It should again, only be added if it backs up an official source. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 19:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 28 March 2011
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Y'know, I don't really go to the series 6 page so much. But some recent technical concerns by mini-mitch drove me there recently, and I was appalled at what I saw. Do you know we have over 40 citations from doctorwhospoilers.com? Guys, that site is in no way valid under tardis:resources. All links to it must be removed, and the site should be explicitly blacklisted in our resources policy. It's not a reputable news outlet. (As things stand, the policy simply doesn't list doctorwhospoilers.com as an acceptable website. We should probably go stronger and specifically deny it.) It's very clear that it's one fan maintaining the site, so it's in no way a peer-reviewed publication. And he explicitly says at the bottom of the front page:
This site is based upon the information from a number of sources, but primarily from the 'Infinte Quest' section of Gallifrey Base.
and
This site should be in no way, shape or form be considered anything approximating the merest hint of the possibility of being official or complete.
Here's what can happen by using this site. TardisFan1975, a hypothetical user of Gallifrey Base, gets drunk one night in his native Arkansas. He decides he's gonna have a bit of fun. So he logs into Gallifrey Base, posts a rumour that he's entirely invented. It spreads across other threads, as things are wont to do on GB. The dude running doctorwhospoilers.com picks up on it, because it's trending across several threads. He's a busy guy. He's got no time to go check out how the rumour originated. He just accepts, because it's spreading like wildfire, that there must be something in it. So he puts it up on his site. We then quote doctorwhospoilers.com and — like bad, bad magic — a drunk guy in Arkansas has managed to affect our content. And, worse, we're passing it on to other people.
That's completely unacceptable.
Every single item on the series 6 page which derives from this site, or any site like it, should be immediately removed from the wiki.
Remember, just because you can find a reference on the internet doesn't mean it's a good reference.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">19:02:01 Mon 28 Mar 2011
- It should only be added to the rumour section if it mentions an official Twitter etc. It is a forum site, and I've been on it when it said a member of a forums came up with idea X', which I just ignored. It should again, only be added if it backs up an official source. Mini-mitch\talk 19:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
