Canon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Real world}} | {{Real world}} | ||
'''Canon''' is the body of works which describe the "real" [[Doctor Who Universe]], though fans often differ as to what they include in their canon. | '''Canon''' is the body of works which describe the "real" [[Doctor Who Universe]], though fans often differ as to what they include in their canon. A fan's "personal canon" are the stories which that fan considers to have "really happened". | ||
The BBC and the production teams have never attempted to promote an official canon, unlike with some other television shows. | |||
==Specific media== | ==Specific media== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
*Fans almost universally regarded ''[[Doctor Who]]'', the television series as "primary canon" and acknowledge ''[[K-9 & Company]]'', ''[[Torchwood]]'' and ''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'' as occuring in a shared universe. | *Fans almost universally regarded ''[[Doctor Who]]'', the television series as "primary canon" and acknowledge ''[[K-9 & Company]]'', ''[[Torchwood]]'' and ''[[The Sarah Jane Adventures]]'' as occuring in a shared universe. | ||
*The majority of fans regard ''[[Shada (TV story)|Shada]]'' as canonical, even though it never reached completion, let alone aired on television. | *The majority of fans regard ''[[Shada (TV story)|Shada]]'' as canonical, even though it never reached completion, let alone aired on television. Exactly which version of the story is canonical is not well settled. | ||
*[[The Pilot Episode]] is not usually considered canon because it is an alternative version of [[An Unearthly Child]] which contradicts the broadcast version. | *[[The Pilot Episode]] is not usually considered canon because it is an alternative version of [[An Unearthly Child]] which contradicts the broadcast version. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
===Movies=== | ===Movies=== | ||
Fans almost universally do not consider the two films starring [[Peter Cushing]], ''[[Dr. Who and the Daleks]]'' or ''[[Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD]]'' as taking place in the mainstream Doctor Who Universe. These have their own canon and their own continuity. These portray established characters in different ways, envisioning for example, the [[First Doctor]] as a [[human]] scientist and re-tell the television stories ''[[The Daleks (TV story)|The Daleks]]'' and ''[[The Dalek Invasion of Earth]]'', respectively, in a different way. | Fans almost universally do not consider the two films starring [[Peter Cushing]], ''[[Dr. Who and the Daleks]]'' or ''[[Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD]]'' as taking place in the mainstream Doctor Who Universe. These have their own canon and their own continuity. These portray established characters in different ways, envisioning for example, the [[First Doctor]] as a [[human]] scientist and re-tell the television stories ''[[The Daleks (TV story)|The Daleks]]'' and ''[[The Dalek Invasion of Earth]]'', respectively, in a different way. | ||
===Books=== | |||
There is endless debate among fans over the canonicity of the various series of original novels. Some accept the [[New Adventures]] and [[Missing Adventures]], some accept the [[BBC Books]], some accept both, and some accept neither. | |||
Russell T. Davies has written in DWM, clarifying that the destruction of Gallifrey in the TV series was not related to the BBC Books, that he cannot put in the TV series any reference to a licensed product which might be taken as requiring BBC viewers to purchase something in order to know the whole story. But in the same article went out of his way to say that there could have been multiple destructions of Gallifrey. He has been consistently careful to make it clear that he wants to make it possible for fans to consider the books canonical, or not, as they prefer; the same attitude has been taken by most of the current series writers. | |||
===Comics=== | ===Comics=== | ||
Most fans consider the early comics stories printed by ''[[TV Comic]]'', ''[[Countdown]]'' ''[[TV Action]]'', created for a juvenile audience and featuring many differences from the TV series including radically different characterization of the Doctor, as not taking place in "real continuity". | |||
The comics printed in ''[[Doctor Who Magazine]]'' have varied wildly in their approach to continuity, depending on editorial policy. During one period, it was policy to tie them into Marvel Universe continuity, which is very difficult to reconcile with Doctor Who television continuity (example: 'The Crossroads of Time'). During another period, it was policy to closely tie them to [[New Adventures]] continuity, and some of the [[New Adventures]] refer to these. During another period they deliberately contradicted the [[New Adventures]] (in ''Ground Zero''). Because of this, almost no fan accepts all of them as canon, but many fans accept '''some''' of them as canon, depending on their tastes. | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 04:10, 30 September 2007
Canon is the body of works which describe the "real" Doctor Who Universe, though fans often differ as to what they include in their canon. A fan's "personal canon" are the stories which that fan considers to have "really happened".
The BBC and the production teams have never attempted to promote an official canon, unlike with some other television shows.
Specific media
Television
- Fans almost universally regarded Doctor Who, the television series as "primary canon" and acknowledge K-9 & Company, Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures as occuring in a shared universe.
- The majority of fans regard Shada as canonical, even though it never reached completion, let alone aired on television. Exactly which version of the story is canonical is not well settled.
- The Pilot Episode is not usually considered canon because it is an alternative version of An Unearthly Child which contradicts the broadcast version.
- Extended and remade versions of episodes released on video and DVD, such as the Five Doctors Special Edition, the movie-format version of The Curse of Fenric, and various 71 edits, are not usually considered canon; only the original broadcast version is. The exception is the four-part version of Revelation of the Daleks, which is usually considered the "canonical version", even though a slightly cut-down two-part version was the broadcast original. Most of the extensions are tiny and do not make significant changes in continuity, but there are some controversial changes in the Five Doctors Special Edition.
- The mini-episodes, A Fix with Sontarans and Dimensions in Time, produced by one of the series' original producers, John Nathan-Turner, are nevertheless generally not considered a part of the original series or as canon by most fans, even though it featured all the (at that time) surviving Doctors and a number of returning companions. John Nathan-Turner apparently considered Dimensions in Time a "real" episode and believed it should have its own official production code. Likewise, The Curse of Fatal Death is also not generally considered to be canon, as it was a parody of the series.
- The canonicity of Doctor Who: The TV Movie is also a matter of contention among some fans, owing to what are seen as continuity issues and an attempt to "Americanize" Doctor Who.The BBC do include it in lists of Doctor Who and it was cited as fully canonical by current producer Russell T. Davies.
Movies
Fans almost universally do not consider the two films starring Peter Cushing, Dr. Who and the Daleks or Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD as taking place in the mainstream Doctor Who Universe. These have their own canon and their own continuity. These portray established characters in different ways, envisioning for example, the First Doctor as a human scientist and re-tell the television stories The Daleks and The Dalek Invasion of Earth, respectively, in a different way.
Books
There is endless debate among fans over the canonicity of the various series of original novels. Some accept the New Adventures and Missing Adventures, some accept the BBC Books, some accept both, and some accept neither.
Russell T. Davies has written in DWM, clarifying that the destruction of Gallifrey in the TV series was not related to the BBC Books, that he cannot put in the TV series any reference to a licensed product which might be taken as requiring BBC viewers to purchase something in order to know the whole story. But in the same article went out of his way to say that there could have been multiple destructions of Gallifrey. He has been consistently careful to make it clear that he wants to make it possible for fans to consider the books canonical, or not, as they prefer; the same attitude has been taken by most of the current series writers.
Comics
Most fans consider the early comics stories printed by TV Comic, Countdown TV Action, created for a juvenile audience and featuring many differences from the TV series including radically different characterization of the Doctor, as not taking place in "real continuity".
The comics printed in Doctor Who Magazine have varied wildly in their approach to continuity, depending on editorial policy. During one period, it was policy to tie them into Marvel Universe continuity, which is very difficult to reconcile with Doctor Who television continuity (example: 'The Crossroads of Time'). During another period, it was policy to closely tie them to New Adventures continuity, and some of the New Adventures refer to these. During another period they deliberately contradicted the New Adventures (in Ground Zero). Because of this, almost no fan accepts all of them as canon, but many fans accept some of them as canon, depending on their tastes.
External links
