Forum:New page shock: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Replacing category Out of date with Out-of-date discussions) Tag: thread closure |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive|Panopticon archives}} | {{archive|Panopticon archives}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
: | : | ||
: it was deleted by acsident it was highlited when i added the template but thanks i have alred talked to mich !?[[User:Drwhoworld|Drwhoworld]] 20:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)?! | : it was deleted by acsident it was highlited when i added the template but thanks i have alred talked to mich !?[[User:Drwhoworld|Drwhoworld]] 20:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)?! | ||
[[Category:Out-of-date discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 00:52, 18 November 2024
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → New page shock
This is anoying Basicly I Put A new page up for delition and this was added by mini mich
ANDREW, ARE YOU STILL THERE?
which hapens to be my name but still this is very strange please look into this
a very shocked Drwhoworld 19:51, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Mini-mitch didn't write that. He restored the content that was put up for deletion which you removed when you put up the template. The same unregistered user who created the page was the one who wrote the question. --Nyktimos 20:03, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, as Nyktimos said, it was the unregistered user's message. When you add the delete template, you shouldn't really remove the content. Though if it really is bad, such as lots of swearing etc, then I think it would be understandable. The Thirteenth Doctor 20:07, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
- it was deleted by acsident it was highlited when i added the template but thanks i have alred talked to mich !?Drwhoworld 20:13, June 4, 2010 (UTC)?!
