Forum:Near-human: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Reference desk}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> If anyone ever runs across the term [[near-hum...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
If anyone ever runs across the term [[near-human]] in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me.  If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number.  The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term.  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''01:41:40 Tue&nbsp;'''14 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
If anyone ever runs across the term [[near-human]] in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me.  If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number.  The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term.  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''01:41:40 Tue&nbsp;'''14 Jun 2011&nbsp;</span>
:There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from ''[[Star Wars]]''. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-

Revision as of 02:26, 14 June 2011

IndexReference desk → Near-human
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

If anyone ever runs across the term near-human in any bit of fiction anywhere in the DWU, please put a reference here for me. If in a book, it'd be helpful if you could give the page number. The near-human article really needs a source for the actual term. Thanks :)
czechout<staff />    <span style="">01:41:40 Tue 14 Jun 2011 

There's shouldn't be any reference to it; I just needed a convenient term when making the category, so I took it from Star Wars. We really need to either rename the category or remove it entirely. I haven't seen a specific canonical term for those pseudo-human species, but there have been canonical references to the fact that the species look visually identical, so it's probably worth keeping in some form. -<Azes13 02:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)>-