Talk:1963: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Tardis:Panopticon +Forum:The original Panopticon)) |
m (→Robot: Reporting unavailable external link) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Amxitsa|Amxitsa]] 10:50, 22 Mar 2005 (EST) | --[[User:Amxitsa|Amxitsa]] 10:50, 22 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
== Dead link == | |||
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case! | |||
* http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/doctorwho/dr6402_1.shtml?doc=6402 | |||
** In [[1963]] on 2011-02-24 20:32:58, 404 Not Found | |||
** In [[1963]] on 2011-02-24 21:36:31, 404 Not Found | |||
** In [[1963]] on 2011-11-11 22:03:36, 404 Not Found | |||
--'''[[User:CzechBot|<span style="background:red;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:blue;color:white">Bot</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechBot|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 22:03, November 11, 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:03, 11 November 2011
Articles on Months and Specific Dates?
Okay, this is an issue related to the discussion at the Panopticon as to whether we write this wiki more from the perspective of our reality or that of the "Whoniverse." Do we include entries on each month and for specific dates? If so, do we list Who-related events happening on these dates in our reality, the Whoniverse, or as in this article, both, separating the two into main sections?
I think the best approach for dates is to use the same model as here and split each page into 2 distinct section fact and fiction. The fact can be written from a real world perspective. While the Fiction one written from the "Whoniverse" perspective. That will make it easier for people to find whatever info they are looking for relating to the show
--Amxitsa 10:50, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)
Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!