User talk:Patrick Watt: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Image at Dalek removed== | ==Image at Dalek removed== | ||
[[file:TheFiveMasters.jpg|thumb|right|Maybe the [[Dalek]] infobox needs a multiple-model image, kinda like this one we've done with [[the Master]]?]] | [[file:TheFiveMasters.jpg|thumb|right|Maybe the [[Dalek]] infobox needs a multiple-model image, kinda like this one we've done with [[the Master]]?]] | ||
Please | Please note that our [[tardis:image use policy|image use policy]] in conjunction with our [[tardis:manual of style|manual of style]] regulates the kinds of pictures that can be used. One of the more important concepts is that a publicity still, being an out-of-universe shot, cannot be used on an in-universe page. Thus, I have reverted the image you placed in the infobox at [[Dalek]]. I can quite appreciate that the image currently there is perhaps insufficient, because it only shows post-''[[Victory of the Daleks]]'' models, but, still, you cannot use a publicity shot on that page. Perhaps you could find an image from within ''Victory'' that has most types together? Or maybe you could make an image using various models in different segments, as we've done with the picture to your right. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">00:15: Thu 29 Sep 2011 </span> | ||
==Daleks== | ==Daleks== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
I'm not sure what you;'re talking about. I don't generally do much about images,. If I did something right, you're welcome. If you're being sarcastic, oh well. Sorry. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 23:24, November 18, 2011 (UTC) | I'm not sure what you;'re talking about. I don't generally do much about images,. If I did something right, you're welcome. If you're being sarcastic, oh well. Sorry. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 23:24, November 18, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:You're welcome. I assure you it was inadvertant. Sometimes junk characters appear. Sometimes the code is unstable,. I expect that's what happened. [[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 23:32, November 18, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== You have me confused with someone else == | |||
I've never opposed your using a multiple Dalek image at [[Dalek]]. Please read the first comment on this page. I ''suggested'' that option. | |||
However, you will have to go through the process of submitting it for consideration, because everyone does not share my view. At the end of the day, a multiple image might not succeed in this case because a Dalek is a Dalek is a Dalek. The difference between old and new series Daleks, up to an including the ''Victory'' Daleks, is not so great as the difference between old and new series Silurians. | |||
And Ten doesn't need a pic. The original infobox has been restored, including the pic that was there at the time it was overwritten. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">23:37: Fri 18 Nov 2011 </span> | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 18 November 2011
Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.
Image at Dalek removed
Please note that our image use policy in conjunction with our manual of style regulates the kinds of pictures that can be used. One of the more important concepts is that a publicity still, being an out-of-universe shot, cannot be used on an in-universe page. Thus, I have reverted the image you placed in the infobox at Dalek. I can quite appreciate that the image currently there is perhaps insufficient, because it only shows post-Victory of the Daleks models, but, still, you cannot use a publicity shot on that page. Perhaps you could find an image from within Victory that has most types together? Or maybe you could make an image using various models in different segments, as we've done with the picture to your right.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">00:15: Thu 29 Sep 2011
Daleks
Hey, while your suggestion is good, I'm quite firmly against collage images. Don't worry - I'm not abnormal - I too hate the new Daleks, but we don't want to have loads of unnecessary collages littered around when a single image works just fine in most cases. Raise it at the forums if you fell strongly about though, as my word is far from definitive.--Skittles the hog - talk 14:19, September 30, 2011 (UTC)
Like I said, open a forum topic on it. Please keep messages about the same subject under one heading and remember to sign your posts.--Skittles the hog - talk 07:43, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
Chat
Hey, sorry for missing you in chat earlier today. I tend to have a lot of windows opened, and that one gets buried. Coupla points, though. Chat is still effectively "in beta". It occasionally behaves weirdly, as when it signs people in and out for no reason. You seem to have mistaken my disconnections and reconnections as an intentional effort to get rid of you. They weren't. It was just the chat window being . . . the wikia chat window. And it could hardly have been intentional, since I wasn't even aware of what was going on in that window. Another thing, you called me a jerk twice in chat. Sorry you feel that way, but our [[tardis:no personal attacks|] rule, as confirmed through our chat policy doesn't allow for such things. Please don't attack other users directly like that in future. I'll let you off with a warning this time, but be aware that sort of behavior can lead to really long bans. Thanks :)
I'm actually intrigued by your multi-color-but-not-Skittles®-Dalek idea, and would love to hear it.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">17:49: Mon 10 Oct 2011
Welcoming is automatic
Please don't start another person's user talk page manually, as you did at user talk:Jake Fraser. I know you're just trying to be friendly, and that's great! However, it interferes with normal bot operation, and prevents user:Wikia from automatically placing the welcome template, which gives users important starting information. We really need to make sure that all new users are given a message which clearly says: 1) no spoilers and 2) use British English. New users will get such a message immediately upon making their first edit. So, please: let the bot do its job. Thanks :)
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">23:42: Thu 13 Oct 2011
Chat
When reporting an technical problem, please give more details than "I'm having an error". It's incredibly unlikely that I did anything to affect chat, but still, I need more to go on before I can even begin to help you.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">22:47: Fri 21 Oct 2011
Formal warning: spoilers not allowed
Consider this your final warning.
After considerable thought, I have decided not to block you at the present time. Rather, I'm going to give you one more chance. Even if you've done so before, go now and read our spoiler policy and our chat policy. You must understand what this wiki considers to be a spoiler, and that the general policies of the wiki do apply in chat. Don't repeat or reference spoilers except where the spoiler policy allows. Don't try to "skirt around" the policy by using "code language". If you spoil other editors, they may choose not to edit with us. That's why if you break spoiler policy again, you will be prevented from editing for at least one month.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">01:18: Fri 28 Oct 2011
file:200px-Tenth_Doctor.jpg
The above-named file was deleted for violating several rules. It was mis-licensed (you said it was a screenshot when really it was a publicity shot), it had a bad aspect ratio, it was narrower than the minimum 250px width, and the subject was looking straight into camera. You should probably take a look at our image cheat card before uploading any more pictures.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">22:47: Fri 18 Nov 2011
timelink vol. 1
I'm not sure what you;'re talking about. I don't generally do much about images,. If I did something right, you're welcome. If you're being sarcastic, oh well. Sorry. Boblipton talk to me 23:24, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I assure you it was inadvertant. Sometimes junk characters appear. Sometimes the code is unstable,. I expect that's what happened. Boblipton talk to me 23:32, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
You have me confused with someone else
I've never opposed your using a multiple Dalek image at Dalek. Please read the first comment on this page. I suggested that option.
However, you will have to go through the process of submitting it for consideration, because everyone does not share my view. At the end of the day, a multiple image might not succeed in this case because a Dalek is a Dalek is a Dalek. The difference between old and new series Daleks, up to an including the Victory Daleks, is not so great as the difference between old and new series Silurians.
And Ten doesn't need a pic. The original infobox has been restored, including the pic that was there at the time it was overwritten.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">23:37: Fri 18 Nov 2011
