231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-188432-20130510191633 (edit)
Revision as of 14:34, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Forum:Is the K9 TV series canon?|There was a debate about including ''K9'' back in 2009/10]], and really only one participating user then objected. Since then, our inclusion policy has moved on a bit and now establishes that, generally speaking, as long as the rightful owner(s) of the character have given permission to make the story, and as long as they don't actually say that it's not set in the DWU, then it's assumed to be in the DWU. | [[Forum:Is the K9 TV series canon?|There was a debate about including ''K9'' back in 2009/10]], and really only one participating user then objected. Since then, our inclusion policy has moved on a bit and now establishes that, generally speaking, as long as the rightful owner(s) of the character have given permission to make the story, and as long as they don't actually say that it's not set in the DWU, then it's assumed to be in the DWU. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
Basically, the use of what absolutely appeared to be [[K9 Mark I]] in ''[[Regeneration (TV story)|Regeneration]]'' was the condition for being able to use [[K9 Mark IV]] simultaneously in ''SJA''. So we here at Tardis are stuck covering a four-year-old failed series that none of us are particularly enthusiastic about. | Basically, the use of what absolutely appeared to be [[K9 Mark I]] in ''[[Regeneration (TV story)|Regeneration]]'' was the condition for being able to use [[K9 Mark IV]] simultaneously in ''SJA''. So we here at Tardis are stuck covering a four-year-old failed series that none of us are particularly enthusiastic about. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130510191633-188432]]</noinclude> | ||