230,460
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20180211042121 (edit)
Revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it's pretty clear that the qualities needed by a video game to be valid are that it should have '''the same narrative for every user''', just as other stories in all other media do. Since my original suggestion has been rather strongly opposed, my new suggestion is this: | I think it's pretty clear that the qualities needed by a video game to be valid are that it should have '''the same narrative for every user''', just as other stories in all other media do. Since my original suggestion has been rather strongly opposed, my new suggestion is this: | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Many of the arguments listed above (and in other threads) for keeping certain video games valid tend to ignore the issue of '''having the same narrative for all users'''. But like it or not, it is one of the rules for determining valid sources. | Many of the arguments listed above (and in other threads) for keeping certain video games valid tend to ignore the issue of '''having the same narrative for all users'''. But like it or not, it is one of the rules for determining valid sources. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20180211042121-1432718]]</noinclude> | ||