231,245
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20171126175208 (edit)
Revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know that everyone is asking a question every three posts, but here's mine: when does "alternate paths" in a game mean that we can no longer cover it? | I know that everyone is asking a question every three posts, but here's mine: when does "alternate paths" in a game mean that we can no longer cover it? | ||
For instance, many of the Eleventh Doctor games that have straight-forward narratives still have alternate dialogue paths that you can come across. Characters will say different things to you if you have various items, for instance. Is that enough to call the game invalid? If not, how much has to be variable for it to be uncoverable? | For instance, many of the Eleventh Doctor games that have straight-forward narratives still have alternate dialogue paths that you can come across. Characters will say different things to you if you have various items, for instance. Is that enough to call the game invalid? If not, how much has to be variable for it to be uncoverable? | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171126175208-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||