231,276
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since this phenomenon is something that Moffat and company have not continued, it's kind of a closed chapter in ''Who'' history. The sites are now winking offline as the BBC finds fewer reasons to maintain connections to that era of the program. | Since this phenomenon is something that Moffat and company have not continued, it's kind of a closed chapter in ''Who'' history. The sites are now winking offline as the BBC finds fewer reasons to maintain connections to that era of the program. | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
I say we should declare ''all of them'' invalid — principally because their content is variable over time. That will then free us to systematically look at their archived history so as to create more complete picture of them for our readers. | I say we should declare ''all of them'' invalid — principally because their content is variable over time. That will then free us to systematically look at their archived history so as to create more complete picture of them for our readers. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129190934-4139960/20130129225956-188432]]</noinclude> |