229,659
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
But it ''is'' as rigorous and uniform as it needs to be. Citing episodes and citing stories are ''different types of citation'', so they ''need'' to look different. That was my point with bringing up the prefixes: in both cases, the need they answer is to make it immediately obvious to the savvy reader what sort of sources is being linked to. | But it ''is'' as rigorous and uniform as it needs to be. Citing episodes and citing stories are ''different types of citation'', so they ''need'' to look different. That was my point with bringing up the prefixes: in both cases, the need they answer is to make it immediately obvious to the savvy reader what sort of sources is being linked to. | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
There may be CSS objections which escape me, but if it's feasible, would that resolve your troubles — while still allowing us to cite either whole stories or individual episodes, depending on what is most efficient? (EPISODE is probably not the best prefix name, though, as it wouldn't really fit for prose installments as in the ''[[The Time Lord Letters (novel)|Time Lord Letters]]'' case.) | There may be CSS objections which escape me, but if it's feasible, would that resolve your troubles — while still allowing us to cite either whole stories or individual episodes, depending on what is most efficient? (EPISODE is probably not the best prefix name, though, as it wouldn't really fit for prose installments as in the ''[[The Time Lord Letters (novel)|Time Lord Letters]]'' case.) | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200625144019-44988386/20200625155004-6032121]]</noinclude> |