Talk:River Song/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
(Question about the Blue Book) |
(Question about the Blue Book) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Yes, it seemed quite obvious that the Blue Book contains some of the Doctor's future and that River Song knows him pretty well. | Yes, it seemed quite obvious that the Blue Book contains some of the Doctor's future and that River Song knows him pretty well. | ||
She also mentioned that he looks younger than the version she knows, but it didn't sound to me as if he was dead in her time-line. And since she's so careful about the book, I think she wouldn't dare to mention something like this about his future. | She also mentioned that he looks younger than the version she knows, but it didn't sound to me as if he was dead in her time-line. And since she's so careful about the book, I think she wouldn't dare to mention something like this about his future. | ||
[[User:Treelight|Treelight]] 18:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:01, 2 June 2008
After reading this entry, I've got a question about it's mention of the Blue Book.
I'd like to refer to this part: "... this might indicate that the blue book is in fact the Doctor's biography, written some time after his death later on in his own personal time-line."
How was it mentioned or indicated that this book was written after the Doctor's death? And since he's a Time Lord ... should this mean his final death or "just" a regeneration?
Yes, it seemed quite obvious that the Blue Book contains some of the Doctor's future and that River Song knows him pretty well. She also mentioned that he looks younger than the version she knows, but it didn't sound to me as if he was dead in her time-line. And since she's so careful about the book, I think she wouldn't dare to mention something like this about his future.
Treelight 18:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
