Talk:Attack of the Graske (video game): Difference between revisions
m (moved Talk:Attack of the Graske (TV story) to Talk:Attack of the Graske (video game): See Forum:Attack of the Graske: tv or video game for rationale of name change. No redirect left behind; nothing was ever really linked to the (TV story)...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
didnt saw any zygon --[[User:Ceryu|Ceryu]] 03:04, July 19, 2011 (UTC) | didnt saw any zygon --[[User:Ceryu|Ceryu]] 03:04, July 19, 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Name change == | |||
Article was moved to [[Attack of the Graske (video game)]] based on consensus achieved at [[Forum:Attack of the Graske: tv or video game]]. Please do not move this page without achieving a similar consensus. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">22:55: Fri 30 Mar 2012 </span> | |||
Revision as of 22:55, 30 March 2012
I'm being deliberately provocative and controvertial here, but is this story 'canon'? Discuss!
--Mantrid 19:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno, but it certainly shouldn't be listed under "Television stories". Ben Standeven 22:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, the more I think about it, the more it seems to qualify as a pastiche rather than a canonical television story. I'll be making the appropriate changes.
--Freethinker1of1 15:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I agree that it's a pastiche (though I know what you're getting at). I would suggest, due to its interactive nature, that it would be more appropriately categorised as a game (just like the various other Who computer games).
--Mantrid 17:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I agree that it's a pastiche (though I know what you're getting at). I would suggest, due to its interactive nature, that it would be more appropriately categorised as a game (just like the various other Who computer games).
- I would agree that it would seem more suited to being considered a game --Amxitsa 20:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Article said:
- Billie Piper (Rose Tyler) does not appear in this story. For this reason among others, the canonicity of this story is in dispute. Many do not regard it as an "official" television story. However, the Graske would later reappear in The Sarah Jane Adventures story Whatever Happened to Sarah Jane?, lending credence to their canonicity.
- The first sentence of this seems especially troubling to me, as the story explains where Rose is. If anything, her absence helps to move this story towards canon, not away. It gives the Doctor motivation to look for a new companion. The adventure doesn't take place without consideration of Rose; it only occurs because she's gone. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 00:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Online version?
I believe there was a online version of this episode from the BBC before it was taken down off the website. Can this be added? Are they any other version available online to get the full experience beyond the Youtube vids? Zidel333 20:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- I played/watched it online, so yes, there was. 75.88.50.115 02:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
didnt saw any zygon --Ceryu 03:04, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Name change
Article was moved to Attack of the Graske (video game) based on consensus achieved at Forum:Attack of the Graske: tv or video game. Please do not move this page without achieving a similar consensus.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">22:55: Fri 30 Mar 2012
