User talk:OttselSpy25: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Categories== | ==Categories== | ||
Please, when creating categories make sure they're consistent in their nomenclature and casing as others in similar categories. You had a mix of upper and lower case on the Unproduced images categories. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:47, April 12, 2012 (UTC) | Please, when creating categories make sure they're consistent in their nomenclature and casing as others in similar categories. You had a mix of upper and lower case on the Unproduced images categories. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:47, April 12, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Further to the unproduced TV story image categories, specifically, '''please stop'''. We won't be categorising such images, and you shouldn't really be bringing these images into the wiki, anyway. They are illustrations '''''of the article''''' in which they appeared. They aren't concept art for the production in question. They are done way after the fact, without the approval of the production team involved. They illustrate merely an artist's impression of what might have been. To put them into the article muddies the waters to an unacceptable degree. | |||
:Again, I urge you to move into the area of finding photography of '''actual stories''' that are '''firmly within the DWU'''. Please stop wasting your time and my time with these things that are on the very fringe of the DWU. We haven't gotten images for every character in the televised DWU, even. That's what we need ''much'' more than these little back alleys of the DWU. | |||
:All of your "unproduced" categories have been summarily deleted, and the pictures stripped of those categories. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">17:03: Thu 12 Apr 2012 </span> | |||
Revision as of 17:03, 12 April 2012
Mission to the Unknown
We don't. It's the one story we can't at all illustrate in the infobox or the plot sections. The reuse of file:Varga.jpg is fine, because you're showing it as a publicity shot.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">21:03: Mon 09 Apr 2012
- If you encounter pictures you don't think meet our standards — for any reason, but obviously including alleged publicity photos — please tag them with {{delete}} and give a deletion rationale. So, {{delete|This image can't possibly be from the episode, because no telesnaps were made, and none of the footage survives}}. Even if the photo isn't ultimately deleted, it at least will bring it to greater attention and it may get moved.
In the cases you've brought up, I'd remove them from the character infoboxes and probably move them to the actors' pages, unless the actors' pages are already illustrated.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">21:34: Mon 09 Apr 2012
forgivness
sorry its not that because there's loads of the end of time images that why you forgot to add them otherwise that they won't know what the pictures from the episode it was.
User:JarodMighty 05:32, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
pictures of the symbols of Gallifrey, Time Lords & The Seal of Rassilon & Omega
these pictures from my user page were mine they were for my userpage
--User:JarodMighty 14:55, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
Coop3 and JarodMighty
Hey, I've dropped a message onto JarodMighty's talk page encouraging him to take a look around the wiki and see how it all functions. That's the way I believe a lot of people learn by looking and reading and working out how a wiki works.
I agree with you with regard to Coop3's contributions, they're not brilliant. Some of the edits have been picked up by others and fixed or as you've done undone. I've rolled back the rest as it's mostly speculation. Let me know if you want an admin to leave a warning/friendly note if they start up again with more speculation. Thanks. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:01, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
Dimensions in Time
Please remove all references to the 20 pictures from Dimensions in Time that you uploaded. Make it your top priority, please. And please heed what's told you on your talk page so that both you and I don't have to keep doing all this unnecessary work.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">02:38: Thu 12 Apr 2012
- There's no legal copy of the thing to be had, so therefore it doesn't matter even if you had the original source videotape to take screenshots from. Effectively, the BBC doesn't retain copyright on the show, since they are unable to redistribute it. It is, in all but name, an unlicensed production. Arguing that it came from Loose Cannon — I bet it didn't, but whatever — doesn't help your case at all. T:ICC rules Loose Cannon an illegitimate source of photos.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">04:14: Thu 12 Apr 2012
Categories
Please, when creating categories make sure they're consistent in their nomenclature and casing as others in similar categories. You had a mix of upper and lower case on the Unproduced images categories. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:47, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
- Further to the unproduced TV story image categories, specifically, please stop. We won't be categorising such images, and you shouldn't really be bringing these images into the wiki, anyway. They are illustrations of the article in which they appeared. They aren't concept art for the production in question. They are done way after the fact, without the approval of the production team involved. They illustrate merely an artist's impression of what might have been. To put them into the article muddies the waters to an unacceptable degree.
- Again, I urge you to move into the area of finding photography of actual stories that are firmly within the DWU. Please stop wasting your time and my time with these things that are on the very fringe of the DWU. We haven't gotten images for every character in the televised DWU, even. That's what we need much more than these little back alleys of the DWU.
