Talk:Seventh Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Why is there so little content from the New Adventures included in this article and yet so much covering the Seventh Doctor's Big Finish Productions stories? I'm completely certain there is a lot more information that could be added from the books. --[[User:Alan-WK|Confirm Nothing...Deny Everything]] <sup>[[User talk:Alan-WK|talk to me]]</sup> 22:32, May 10, 2012 (UTC) | Why is there so little content from the New Adventures included in this article and yet so much covering the Seventh Doctor's Big Finish Productions stories? I'm completely certain there is a lot more information that could be added from the books. --[[User:Alan-WK|Confirm Nothing...Deny Everything]] <sup>[[User talk:Alan-WK|talk to me]]</sup> 22:32, May 10, 2012 (UTC) | ||
: For no reason than that they aren't very heavily read. BFA is at this point, much more popular that NA. (Their also much better) [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:24, May 11, 2012 (UTC) | : For no reason than that they aren't very heavily read. BFA is at this point, much more popular that NA. (Their also much better) [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:24, May 11, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::A very poor reason, and not particularly true either. | |||
And it's 'they're', not 'their'. | |||
Revision as of 18:43, 12 May 2012
New Adventures content
Why is there so little content from the New Adventures included in this article and yet so much covering the Seventh Doctor's Big Finish Productions stories? I'm completely certain there is a lot more information that could be added from the books. --Confirm Nothing...Deny Everything talk to me 22:32, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
- For no reason than that they aren't very heavily read. BFA is at this point, much more popular that NA. (Their also much better) OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:24, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
- A very poor reason, and not particularly true either.
And it's 'they're', not 'their'.
