Forum:Undated and unchronicled events: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
What's your proposed alternative format?[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 12:13, July 7, 2012 (UTC) | What's your proposed alternative format?[[User:Boblipton|Boblipton]] <sup>[[User talk:Boblipton|talk to me]]</sup> 12:13, July 7, 2012 (UTC) | ||
: To not bullet it at all and make it paragraphs, especially for longer undated sections. A lot of DWU fiction doesn't have an obvious placement beyond "features this lineup of Doctor incarnation and companions etc.". I'm just wondering if there's a valid reason in favour of bulleting. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 12: | : To not bullet it at all and make it paragraphs, especially for longer undated sections. A lot of DWU fiction doesn't have an obvious placement beyond "features this lineup of Doctor incarnation and companions etc.". It seems bad form to just unilaterally get rid of such a commonly used format without asking; I'm just wondering if there's a valid reason in favour of bulleting. -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 12:46, July 7, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 7 July 2012
Index → Panopticon → Undated and unchronicled events
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Is there a specific reason for using bullet points for undated event sections on individual and species pages? The only example which didn't use this I could find was Sea Devil. It seems like it really messes up uses of images. After all, "undated" isn't a synonym for unchronicled, offscreen adventures even if a few of those mentioned sections refer to "undated/unchronicled". It could easily refer to a comic story that isn't easy to place. -- Tybort (talk page) 11:34, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
What's your proposed alternative format?Boblipton talk to me 12:13, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
- To not bullet it at all and make it paragraphs, especially for longer undated sections. A lot of DWU fiction doesn't have an obvious placement beyond "features this lineup of Doctor incarnation and companions etc.". It seems bad form to just unilaterally get rid of such a commonly used format without asking; I'm just wondering if there's a valid reason in favour of bulleting. -- Tybort (talk page) 12:46, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
